Differentiator #4 | Spreadsheet less on boarding | FlaggGRC
Stay tuned to read and know more about our Tech-First GRC platform at FlaggGRC Ventures LLP
Visit https://flagggrc.tech to know more!
Differentiator #4 | Spreadsheet less on boarding | FlaggGRC
Stay tuned to read and know more about our Tech-First GRC platform at FlaggGRC Ventures LLP
Visit https://flagggrc.tech to know more!
FlaggGRC | Sign in experience
Stay tuned to read and know more about our Tech-First GRC platform at FlaggGRC Ventures LLP
Visit https://flagggrc.tech to know more!
All acquired companies and potential M&A targets of US companies, a call for caution or a chance to act?
The US Department of Justice (DOJ) has introduced a policy to incentivize acquiring companies to self-report misconduct within acquired companies. The DOJ has adopted a transformative approach, placing a stronger emphasis on transparency and accountability with the introduction of the Voluntary Self Disclosure: DOJ's new Mergers & Acquisitions Safe Harbor Policy.
Acquiring companies stand to gain various benefits, including the presumption of a decision not to prosecute, if they promptly and voluntarily disclose any misconduct within the acquired entities within 6 months of the closing date, regardless of whether it was discovered pre or post-acquisition.
The DOJ emphasizes, "... We are placing an enhanced premium on timely compliance-related due diligence and integration. Compliance must have a prominent seat at the deal table if an acquiring company wishes to effectively de-risk a transaction..."
Well, a compelling trigger for acquired and potential target companies to revisit and optimize their compliance mechanisms for maximum effectiveness OR even to have one in the first place!!??
Stay tuned to read and know more about our Tech-First GRC platform at FlaggGRC Ventures LLP
Visit https://flagggrc.tech to know more!
GRCCast Episode 3 | The Singapore Edition
Stay tuned to read and know more about our Tech-First GRC platform at FlaggGRC Ventures LLP
Visit https://flagggrc.tech to know more!
GRCCast Episode 1 - Why GRC | GRC Market - Indian and Global Overview
Stay tuned to read and know more about our Tech-First GRC platform at FlaggGRC Ventures LLP
Visit https://flagggrc.tech to know more!
A Quick Look at Import-Export of Legal Services
What is ‘Legal Services’?
A broad definition of legal services would include advisory and representation services as well as all the activities relating to the administration of justice (judges, court clerks, public prosecutors, state advocates, etc.).
Legal Services is one of the services that the SEPC has been mandated to promote the exports of.
“Legal service” means any service provided in relation to advice, consultancy or assistance in any branch of law, in any manner and includes representational services before any court, tribunal or authority.
It’s a Taxable service under Service Tax.
‘Legal Services’ under GATS:
General Agreement of Trade in Services (GATS) covers four Modes of delivery of services in cross–border trade.
Legal Services in four Modes of Supply are as under:-
Current Cross-border Status:
As per the Notification No. FEMA 22 /2000-RB dated 3rd May 2000, issued by RBI under Foreign Exchange Management (Establishment in India of branch or office or other place of business) Regulations, 2000-
Prohibition on establishing a branch or office in India by foreign firms. Permitted only with prior approval of RBI.
Bibliography:
(Please Note: This is only a research based article with the support of the Bibliography mentioned herein. It only provides information and personal analysis concerning the given topic.)
Visit https://flagggrc.tech to know more!
Already have a compliance tool but not getting the required output? or Haven’t been able to imbibe the required compliance culture yet?
Let us assess the root cause and fix it for you with our expertise. Reach out to FlaggGRC Ventures LLP
Visit https://flagggrc.tech to know more!
C for Compliance in Japan Inc.
The presence of globalization can be remarkably witnessed in all the Asian countries including Japan. Automobiles and electronic devices have been the strongest export industries of Japan alluring many companies to set up their offices and units in Japan. More the globalization, trade and commerce, greater is the need for governance, risk and compliance in any market. The cases of non-compliance in the Automobiles Industry have already hit the Japanese market between 2000 and 2002. Needless to say that there is an immense need of a robust compliance programme being run by every company belonging to the Japanese Automobile Industry.
Intensive research of applicable laws and compliance related provisions thereunder is a primary step to achieve the hallmarks of a robust compliance programme. Japan being the Civil law system has well codified laws from the view point of statutory and regulatory compliances. However, on the research front, language is one of the biggest barriers that a foreign company may encounter. Since the Japanese laws are notified in Japanese in its Official Gazette, no official English versions are available. Although the translation industry is well benefitted by providing the online translations of Japanese laws, none of such translated laws are without a disclaimer of it being an unofficial translation. Thus, taking the support of a local lawyer in validating the research of applicable laws and the compliance thereunder definitely brings a legal authenticity to the whole compliance process. A bilingual local lawyer who is able to interpret Japanese as well as English proves to be a great recourse to overcome the language barriers. Apart from the language barrier, there are no other limitations as such while researching on the Japanese laws as the Ministries are well updated with the respective legislations issued by them. For example, The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan have a wide and systematic database of all laws segregated into health, labour and welfare related laws along with the White Papers and Reports.
Some nuances of the Japanese legal system may be useful for an Automobiles Industry in running an effective compliance programme in Japan. Some of the alarming latest amendments have taken place in Competition, Consumer Product Safety and the Corporation Tax Act in the period of 2011 to 2013. The Commercial Code of Japan has been repealed by the Companies Act 86 of 2005 however, some of its provisions continue to apply to the companies. Such partial repeal brings more complicated applicability issues for the Japanese companies. The subsidiary laws are issued under the mother legislation in the name of the Order or Ordinances. Apart from the mother legislation, a separate Ordinance for enforcement of each law is issued by the Cabinet which is equally important to be considered along with the mother legislation. Automobile Liability Security Law of 1956 also requires a critical attention of the companies belonging to the Automobiles Industry in terms of regulatory compliances. Since cross-border trade has been one of significant factors of the Japanese economy, the Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade laws of Japan are one of the primary legislations while checking the regulatory compliances.
Department of Justice of the United States stipulates nine hallmarks of a robust compliance programme[1]. An IT enabled compliance management solution is the ultimate and most efficient way of meeting with most of these hallmarks. Also, the technical language translation tool facilitated in such compliance management solution may help the local employees of the company situated in the market like Japan’s in understanding the exact compliances. Thus, an intensive research overcoming the language barrier, an IT enabled solution and a support from the local lawyer prove to have a strong and effective compliance mechanism in place across Japan Inc.
[1] http://www.justice.gov/criminal/fraud/fcpa/guide.pdf
(Please Note: This is only a research based article with the support of the Bibliography mentioned herein. It only provides information and personal analysis concerning the given topic.)
Visit https://flagggrc.tech to know more!
C for Compliance in Japan Inc.
“Good laws have their origins in bad morals” quotes Macrobius, the Roman Writer.
In any legal system, may it be Common as has been adopted by India and the UK or Civil as has been adopted by some of the European countries, the primary origin of any law is a crime or indiscipline in the society. Law is introduced into the society to correct the wrongs and to discourage the wrongdoers from committing the same crimes. In other words, wrongs exist and hence do the laws..!
An example can be cited from a few pieces of legislation from different areas of laws:
In Finance laws, Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 also known as the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act was enacted as a piece of US Federal legislation to ensure the accuracy of the financial information of a corporation, the need for enactment of which arose from a series of corporate and accounting scams. Similarly, in the domain of labor laws, the laws related to abolition of bonded labor, contract labor, etc. were introduced based on the need of protecting rights and interests of these labors.
These examples clearly suggest that enactment of laws has many a times been a corrective step towards the elimination of indiscipline in the society. Such corrective action by way of introducing stricter laws should ideally reduce the number of such crimes and indiscipline in due course of time. However, in spite of this corrective action, the newspapers and media are still able to earn their bread and butter everyday relying upon increasing number of scams and crimes happening in the society. Thus, it is clear that a mere corrective action is not enough and the situation calls for a preventive step in the first place. “Prevention is better than Cure” goes without saying. The need of an hour is a tool that prevents a person from committing the very action of crime and indiscipline in the first place and to give secondary importance to a corrective action i.e. enactment of sanctioning codes to cure the scenario. In view of this necessity, Compliance and Ethics management has proven to be very efficient and effective while serving as a preventive tool for indiscipline in the society.
Compliance simply means the act of complying with the applicable statutory as well as regulatory legislation. The term ethics is a set of morals and principles that a person possesses without any interference of legislation. Michael Joesephson, the President and Founder of Josephson Institute of Ethics, clarifies the difference by defining these terms as “Compliance is what we must do; ethics is about what we should do”. Compliance management can be termed as the process of identification of compliance and implementing it in such manner as required by law. Compliance and Ethics management, as a tool, has proven its efficiency not only with respect to a single natural person but also for an artificial person i.e. a corporation. Due to a huge number and complicated nature of the compliance that a corporation has to comply with, Compliance and Ethics Management is indeed primarily customized and best suited for a corporation. The tool enables a corporation to focus on achieving its goals and targets when its legal compliance are completely taken care of by this tool and the non-compliance are prevented at every stage of its functioning.
Compliance and Ethics Management program as an efficient tool of prevention of any non-compliance may be reaffirmed by citing a recent case of Non-prosecution Agreements (NPAs) entered into by Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) with one of the Argentine Companies. Non-prosecution Agreements are the written agreements that are entered into by the SEC in which the SEC agrees not to take any enforcement action against the entity if it agrees to co-operate fully and truthfully with the investigations. It entered into such NPAs with one of the Argentine companies in relation to the settlements of violations under Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). SEC chose to put this tool of NPA to use due to this Company's prompt initiative in reporting of its non-compliance. The Company was able to take such an initiative primarily since it implemented Compliance and Ethics Management Program in the organization. The non-compliance and misconducts were discovered by the Company as a result of adopting measures to improve its worldwide internal controls and compliance efforts, including implementation of an FCPA compliance training program in Argentina. The SEC took into account the significant remedial measures undertaken by the Company, including a comprehensive new compliance program throughout its operations. Among Company’s remedial measures have been new compliance training, termination of employment and business arrangements with all individuals involved in the wrongdoing, and strengthening its internal controls and its procedures for third party due diligence. The Company also conducted a risk assessment of its major operations worldwide to identify any other compliance problems. The Company has ceased operations in Argentina. Thus, Compliance-oriented steps taken by this Company and SEC’s decision of entering into NPAs with the Company only reiterates the efficiency and effectiveness of the Compliance and Ethics Management as a preventive tool.
Benjamine Disraeli, a former British politician opines “When men are pure, laws are useless; when men are corrupt, laws are broken”. This can be interpreted as a fact that the laws remain as mere corrective written instructions for maintaining discipline in the society. It is indeed the process of managing compliance and ethics that prevents this indiscipline from occurring in the society in the first place. It is the Compliance and Ethic Management that prevents the very enforcement of sanctions given under the laws against a person and its aftermaths. Though, the strength and potential of the Compliance and Ethics Management tool is highly untapped at the moment, the cases such as that of the Argentine Company will soon reveal its hidden significance and bring metamorphic change in any legal system.
(Please Note: This is only a research based article with the support of the Bibliography mentioned herein. It only provides information and personal analysis concerning the given topic.)
Visit https://flagggrc.tech to know more!
Databases loaded with statutory penalties given against each compliance obligation do not adequately assess the potential impact of risk or the potential areas of risk.
The approach towards assessing the risk of non-compliance needs to be analytical rather than just informative.
Reach out to us at FlaggGRC Ventures LLP to find out more.
Visit https://flagggrc.tech to know more!